Core i7-6700 vs i3-10105
Description
The i7-6700 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0653
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.76k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.4k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.83k
28.9k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
25.85k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.88k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.14k
8.29k (x1.35)
TOTAL
57.76k
68.92k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-6700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
109.79k
111.69k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
110.23k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.72k
28.45k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
3.56k (x0.55)
TOTAL
243.4k
253.93k (x1.04)
Performance/W
i7-6700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1689 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1575 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3745 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6206 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5456 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1535 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4