| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i7-6700 is based on Skylake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
870f10
Core
Skylake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.76k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.4k points
348.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.83k
16.04k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
24.47k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
8.38k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.14k
21.66k (x3.53)
TOTAL
57.76k
70.55k (x1.22)

Multithread

i7-6700

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
109.79k
113.63k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
143.55k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.72k
63.84k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
27.34k (x4.2)
TOTAL
243.4k
348.35k (x1.43)

Performance/W
i7-6700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1689 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1575 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3745 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6206 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5456 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1535 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4