| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The i7-6700 is based on Skylake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.5 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f10
Core
Skylake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2015
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.76k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.4k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.83k
13.75k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
22.58k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.14k
3.55k (x0.58)
TOTAL
57.76k
44.87k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-6700

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
109.79k
50.99k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
84.4k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.72k
18.95k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
3.2k (x0.49)
TOTAL
243.4k
157.54k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i7-6700
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1689 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1575 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
3745 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6206 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5456 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1535 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4