| | | | | | |

Core i7-6600U vs Pentium E5200 (M0)


Description
The i7-6600U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6600U gets a score of 48.2 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6600U is 2.2 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
10676
Core
Skylake-U
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
39.73k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.22k points
22.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-6600U
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
6.76k
2.88k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
9.58k
6.31k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
2.53k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
1.35k (x0.32)
TOTAL
22.99k
13.08k (x0.57)

Multithread

i7-6600U

E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
5.45k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
11.5k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
4.02k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
1.05k (x0.24)
TOTAL
48.16k
22.02k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i7-6600U
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
958 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1586 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
286 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
3211 points/W
339 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6600U
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1989 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2818 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
724 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1229 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
6761 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4