Core i7-6600U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-6600U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6600U gets a score of 79.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6600U gets a score of 79.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.73k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.22k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.75k
3.89k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
12.23k
17.94k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
5.34k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
6.62k (x1.18)
TOTAL
24.48k
33.79k (x1.38)
Multithread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5.23k
15.07k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
66.84k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.98k
19.56k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.73k
6.54k (x1.38)
TOTAL
43.95k
108.01k (x2.46)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.76k
14.3k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
9.58k
21.69k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
5.42k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
6.6k (x1.58)
TOTAL
22.99k
48k (x2.09)
Multithread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
55.45k (x3.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
83.13k (x3.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
20.76k (x3.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
6.58k (x1.53)
TOTAL
48.16k
165.91k (x3.44)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
13.05k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
10.92k
22.88k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
5.39k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.93k
7.31k (x1.48)
TOTAL
27.1k
48.63k (x1.79)
Multithread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.11k
51.73k (x3.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.05k
87.74k (x4.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
20.74k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.73k
6.57k (x1.39)
TOTAL
45.05k
166.79k (x3.7)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.72k
14.48k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
23.84k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.4k
5.43k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
5.46k (x1.11)
TOTAL
39.73k
49.21k (x1.24)
Multithread
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
33.41k
54.39k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
31.66k
88.77k (x2.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.18k
20.04k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
5.48k (x0.92)
TOTAL
79.22k
168.69k (x2.13)
Performance/W
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2227 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
546 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
398 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5282 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4919 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4325 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
999 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
11684 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4