Core i7-6560U vs i5-9400F
Description
The i7-6560U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 107 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 3.1 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 107 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 3.1 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
906ea
Core
Skylake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.96k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
107.01k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6560U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.21k
27.15k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
19.25k
23.63k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.38k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.09k
11.61k (x1.64)
TOTAL
52.96k
67.77k (x1.28)
Multithread
i7-6560U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
44.94k
156.61k (x3.48)
Test#2 (FP)
44.98k
138k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
29.45k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.26k
7.14k (x1.14)
TOTAL
107.01k
331.19k (x3.09)
Performance/W
i7-6560U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2998 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
722 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
418 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
7134 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6560U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6941 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6017 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2214 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
16550 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4