| | | | | | |

Core i7-6560U vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i7-6560U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 107 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.96k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
107.01k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6560U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3.29k
3.88k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
13.52k
14.98k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
9.7k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
8.6k (x1.21)
TOTAL
28.14k
37.15k (x1.32)

Multithread

i7-6560U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6.49k
14.61k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
31.11k
54.9k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.25k
27.58k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.16k
5.04k (x0.82)
TOTAL
54.01k
102.13k (x1.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6560U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
22.21k
21.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.25k
17.71k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
7.92k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.09k
8.24k (x1.16)
TOTAL
52.96k
55.37k (x1.05)

Multithread

i7-6560U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
44.94k
73.03k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
44.98k
68.19k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
24.89k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.26k
5.54k (x0.88)
TOTAL
107.01k
171.65k (x1.6)

Performance/W
i7-6560U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2998 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
722 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
418 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
7134 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6560U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6941 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6017 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2214 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16550 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4