Core i7-6560U vs Celeron J4105
Description
The i7-6560U is based on Skylake architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 54 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6560U is 1.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 54 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6560U is 1.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
706a1
Core
Skylake-U
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2015
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.96k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
107.01k points
61.49k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6560U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.29k
1.68k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
13.52k
5.29k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
2.75k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
3.44k (x0.49)
TOTAL
28.14k
13.16k (x0.47)
Multithread
i7-6560U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
6.49k
6.39k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
31.11k
20.02k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.25k
10.22k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.16k
4.94k (x0.8)
TOTAL
54.01k
41.57k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i7-6560U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
433 points/W
639 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2074 points/W
2002 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
683 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
411 points/W
494 points/W
TOTAL
3601 points/W
4157 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6560U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4226 points/GHz
2116 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1324 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2214 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
8793 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4