| | | | | | |

Core i7-6560U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE


Description
The i7-6560U is based on Skylake architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 107 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 4.4 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
860f01
Core
Skylake-U
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2015
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.96k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
107.01k points
469.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6560U
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
22.21k
16.95k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
19.25k
26.26k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
9.4k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.09k
8.38k (x1.18)
TOTAL
52.96k
60.99k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-6560U

4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
44.94k
159.87k (x3.56)
Test#2 (FP)
44.98k
215.44k (x4.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
88.45k (x8.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.26k
5.9k (x0.94)
TOTAL
107.01k
469.67k (x4.39)

Performance/W
i7-6560U
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2998 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
722 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
418 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
7134 points/W
13419 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6560U
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
6941 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6017 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2214 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
16550 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4