| | | | | | |

Core i7-6560U vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i7-6560U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 107 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.96k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
107.01k points
168.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6560U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.29k
3.89k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
13.52k
17.94k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
5.34k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
6.62k (x0.93)
TOTAL
28.14k
33.79k (x1.2)

Multithread

i7-6560U

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.49k
15.07k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
31.11k
66.84k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.25k
19.56k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.16k
6.54k (x1.06)
TOTAL
54.01k
108.01k (x2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6560U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.21k
14.48k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.25k
23.84k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.43k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.09k
5.46k (x0.77)
TOTAL
52.96k
49.21k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-6560U

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
44.94k
54.39k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
44.98k
88.77k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
20.04k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.26k
5.48k (x0.87)
TOTAL
107.01k
168.69k (x1.58)

Performance/W
i7-6560U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2998 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
722 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
418 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
7134 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6560U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6941 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6017 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2214 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16550 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4