Core i7-6560U vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The i7-6560U is based on Skylake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 54 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 54 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
100fa0
Core
Skylake-U
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
52.96k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
107.01k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6560U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.29k
1.98k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
13.52k
4.57k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
2.57k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
3.51k (x0.5)
TOTAL
28.14k
12.64k (x0.45)
Multithread
i7-6560U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.49k
11.86k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
31.11k
27.4k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.25k
15.39k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.16k
3.46k (x0.56)
TOTAL
54.01k
58.11k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i7-6560U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
433 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2074 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
683 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
411 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
3601 points/W
612 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6560U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4226 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1324 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2214 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
8793 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4