| | | | | | |

Core i7-6500U vs i3-8130U


Description
The i7-6500U is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6500U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6500U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
806ea
Core
Skylake-U
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
46.25k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6500U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
21.09k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.58k
19.41k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
4.05k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.15k
2.8k (x0.54)
TOTAL
46.25k
47.35k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-6500U

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.05k
38.23k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
38.89k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
8.75k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.86k
2.47k (x0.42)
TOTAL
97.52k
88.35k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i7-6500U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2803 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2680 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
626 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
391 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6500U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6279 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5672 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1305 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1662 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
14918 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4