Core i7-6500U vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i7-6500U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6500U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6500U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6500U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6500U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.25k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6500U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
11.13k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
17.58k
19.38k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
4.47k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.15k
3.87k (x0.75)
TOTAL
46.25k
38.85k (x0.84)
Multithread
i7-6500U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.05k
17.13k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
30.56k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
9.44k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.86k
4.09k (x0.7)
TOTAL
97.52k
61.23k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i7-6500U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2803 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2680 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
626 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
391 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6500U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6279 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5672 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1305 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1662 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
14918 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4