Core i7-5820K vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
50654
Core
Haswell-E
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
140 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
281.48k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
3k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
12.29k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
3.64k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
6.55k (x1.73)
TOTAL
21.53k
25.46k (x1.18)
Multithread
i7-5820K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
20.42k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
95.83k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
30.88k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
9.7k (x1.21)
TOTAL
117.38k
156.83k (x1.34)
Performance/W
i7-5820K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
240 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
459 points/W
1127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
363 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
838 points/W
1845 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1062 points/GHz
998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2678 points/GHz
4095 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1050 points/GHz
2182 points/GHz
TOTAL
5981 points/GHz
8487 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4