| | | | | | |

Core i7-5820K vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
50657
Core
Haswell-E
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
140 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
1.97k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
8.15k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
2.37k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
4.84k (x1.28)
TOTAL
21.53k
17.32k (x0.8)

Multithread

i7-5820K

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
15.73k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
64.78k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
18.06k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
5.21k (x0.65)
TOTAL
117.38k
103.77k (x0.88)

Performance/W
i7-5820K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
459 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
838 points/W
1221 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1062 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2678 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1050 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5981 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4