Core i7-5820K vs i7-3770
Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
306a9
Core
Haswell-E
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
140 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
34.59k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
133.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5820K
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
12.03k
12.55k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.23k
12.11k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.69k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
5.25k (x1.41)
TOTAL
31.53k
34.59k (x1.1)
Multithread
i7-5820K
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
49.48k
49.56k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
52.21k
56.21k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.7k
22.17k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.67k
5.75k (x0.75)
TOTAL
129.06k
133.7k (x1.04)
Performance/W
i7-5820K
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
353 points/W
644 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
373 points/W
730 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
922 points/W
1736 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3119 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
8759 points/GHz
8870 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4