| | | | | | |

Core i7-5820K vs i7-10750H


Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.6 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0652
Core
Haswell-E
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
140 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
4.69k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
18.71k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
5.84k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
13.95k (x3.69)
TOTAL
21.53k
43.19k (x2.01)

Multithread

i7-5820K

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
18.79k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
86.1k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
27.42k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
5.27k (x0.66)
TOTAL
117.38k
137.58k (x1.17)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5820K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.03k
16.71k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
11.23k
25.45k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
6.06k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
13.2k (x3.55)
TOTAL
31.53k
61.43k (x1.95)

Multithread

i7-5820K

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
49.48k
67.59k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
52.21k
111.94k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.7k
27.7k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.67k
5.3k (x0.69)
TOTAL
129.06k
212.53k (x1.65)

Performance/W
i7-5820K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
353 points/W
1502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
373 points/W
2487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
922 points/W
4723 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
3342 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3119 points/GHz
5091 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
TOTAL
8759 points/GHz
12285 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4