Core i7-5820K vs i5-3340M
Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.1 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.1 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
306a9
Core
Haswell-E
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
6/12
2 /2
TDP
140 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5820K
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.03k
11.51k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
11.23k
11.13k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.4k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
4.55k (x1.22)
TOTAL
31.53k
31.58k (x1)
Multithread
i7-5820K
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
49.48k
22.59k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
52.21k
25.49k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.7k
10.42k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.67k
4.25k (x0.55)
TOTAL
129.06k
62.75k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i7-5820K
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
353 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
373 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
922 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3119 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
8759 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4