Core i7-5820K vs Ryzen 5 3550H
Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 1.1 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 1.1 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f81
Core
Haswell-E
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
140 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
178.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
3.63k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
16.69k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.92k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
5k (x1.32)
TOTAL
21.53k
30.24k (x1.4)
Multithread
i7-5820K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
13.62k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
65.71k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
23.7k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
5.64k (x0.7)
TOTAL
117.38k
108.67k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i7-5820K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
459 points/W
1877 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
838 points/W
3105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1062 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2678 points/GHz
4512 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/GHz
1329 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1050 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
TOTAL
5981 points/GHz
8174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4