| | | | | | |

Core i7-5820K vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.5 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f10
Core
Haswell-E
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
140 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
3.8k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
17.38k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
5.17k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
3.16k (x0.84)
TOTAL
21.53k
29.52k (x1.37)

Multithread

i7-5820K

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
15.28k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
76.44k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
27.48k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
3.02k (x0.38)
TOTAL
117.38k
122.2k (x1.04)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5820K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.03k
13.04k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
11.23k
22.35k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.37k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
3.4k (x0.91)
TOTAL
31.53k
44.15k (x1.4)

Multithread

i7-5820K

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
49.48k
56.49k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
52.21k
100.74k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.7k
28.21k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.67k
3.04k (x0.4)
TOTAL
129.06k
188.49k (x1.46)

Performance/W
i7-5820K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
353 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
373 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
922 points/W
2900 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3119 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
8759 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4