| | | | | | |

Core i7-5500U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
Both models i7-5500U and E5-2620 v4 are based on Broadwell architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5500U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i7-5500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
406f1
Core
Broadwell-U
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.41k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
82.89k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.31k
2.6k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
7.55k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
2.61k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
2.03k (x0.63)
TOTAL
22.1k
14.79k (x0.67)

Multithread

i7-5500U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.97k
17.41k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.54k
75.46k (x2.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.8k
26.25k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
4.65k (x1.39)
TOTAL
43.67k
123.78k (x2.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-5500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.59k
8.22k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
13.72k
12.06k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.01k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
2.89k (x0.79)
TOTAL
32.16k
27.18k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-5500U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.8k
61.34k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
30.44k
90.21k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.1k
26.2k (x2.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
4.62k (x1.38)
TOTAL
63.69k
182.37k (x2.86)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.37k
6.04k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
14.25k
10.18k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
2.74k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
2.41k (x0.77)
TOTAL
31.81k
21.37k (x0.67)

Multithread

i7-5500U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.93k
47.51k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
33.87k
75.12k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.98k
19.72k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
5.45k (x1.63)
TOTAL
67.13k
147.8k (x2.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-5500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.76k
12.16k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
14.9k
11.82k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
3.02k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.58k
2.4k (x0.67)
TOTAL
40.41k
29.39k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-5500U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
34.9k
103.77k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
35.07k
102.28k (x2.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
26.13k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
5.65k (x1.55)
TOTAL
82.89k
237.83k (x2.87)

Performance/W
i7-5500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2327 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2338 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
619 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
243 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
5526 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5920 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4966 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1390 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1193 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
13469 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4