| | | | | | |

Core i7-5500U vs A8 9600


Description
The i7-5500U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 9600 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5500U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 9600 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
660f51
Core
Broadwell-U
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.41k points
32.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
82.89k points
92.52k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-5500U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.76k
11.66k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
14.9k
14.96k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
3.33k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.58k
2.8k (x0.78)
TOTAL
40.41k
32.75k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-5500U

9600
Test#1 (Integers)
34.9k
38.61k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
35.07k
38.92k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
11.57k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
3.43k (x0.94)
TOTAL
82.89k
92.52k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i7-5500U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
2327 points/W
594 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2338 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
619 points/W
178 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
243 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
5526 points/W
1423 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5500U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
5920 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4966 points/GHz
4400 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1390 points/GHz
979 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1193 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
TOTAL
13469 points/GHz
9632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4