| | | | | | |

Core i7-5500U vs Mobile 3020e


Description
The i7-5500U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5500U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5500U is 1.6 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
820f01
Core
Broadwell-U
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.41k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
82.89k points
52.42k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-5500U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
17.76k
9.28k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
14.9k
14.56k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
3.44k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.58k
2.06k (x0.58)
TOTAL
40.41k
29.34k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-5500U

3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
34.9k
15.75k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
35.07k
28.63k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
5.87k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
2.17k (x0.59)
TOTAL
82.89k
52.42k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i7-5500U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
2327 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2338 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
619 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
243 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
5526 points/W
8737 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5500U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
5920 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4966 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1390 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1193 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
13469 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4