Core i7-4930K vs i5-10400T
Description
The i7-4930K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4930K gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4930K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4930K gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4930K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge-E
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
32.22k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
307.18k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4930K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
12.5k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
19.05k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.72k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
10.3k (x2.37)
TOTAL
32.22k
46.57k (x1.45)
Multithread
i7-4930K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
72.46k
74.58k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
80.33k
126.96k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
31.76k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.03k
2.5k (x0.21)
TOTAL
198.27k
235.8k (x1.19)
Performance/W
i7-4930K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
557 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
618 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
257 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1525 points/W
6737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4930K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3077 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2910 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1115 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
8262 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4