Core i7-4820K vs i9-9900K
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i9-9900K gets 402.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i9-9900K gets 402.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906ed
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
529.32k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
17.98k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
27.04k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.63k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
13.6k (x3.3)
TOTAL
32.49k
65.24k (x2.01)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
130.88k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
208.5k (x3.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
54.12k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
8.91k (x0.89)
TOTAL
134.08k
402.41k (x3)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
1378 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
2195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
4236 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3596 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5408 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
2720 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
13049 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4