Core i7-4820K vs i7-5820K
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
130 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
15360 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
129.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
12.03k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
11.23k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.55k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.72k (x0.9)
TOTAL
32.49k
31.53k (x0.97)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
49.48k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
52.21k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
19.7k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
7.67k (x0.76)
TOTAL
134.08k
129.06k (x0.96)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
353 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
373 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
922 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
3119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
8759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4