| | | | | | |

Core i7-4820K vs i7-10510U


Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i7-10510U gets 169.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806ec
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
190.82k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
17.52k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
26.74k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.22k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
13.33k (x3.24)
TOTAL
32.49k
63.81k (x1.96)

Multithread

i7-4820K

i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
54.53k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
85.61k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
20.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
8.05k (x0.8)
TOTAL
134.08k
169.07k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i7-4820K
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
3635 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
5707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
537 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
11271 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3576 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
2720 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
13022 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4