Core i7-4820K vs i5-8500
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-8500 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-8500 gets 232.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-8500 gets 232.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906ea
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
69.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
307.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
15.21k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
22.94k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.54k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
11.39k (x2.77)
TOTAL
32.49k
55.07k (x1.7)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
79.52k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
107.78k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
31.89k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
13.37k (x1.33)
TOTAL
134.08k
232.55k (x1.73)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
1223 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
1658 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
3578 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5595 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
13433 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4