Core i7-4820K vs i5-5675R
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-5675R gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-5675R gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
40671
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
194.2k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
12.88k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
18.27k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.12k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.45k (x1.32)
TOTAL
32.49k
41.72k (x1.28)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
49.91k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
70.3k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
19.69k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
16.92k (x1.68)
TOTAL
134.08k
156.83k (x1.17)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
768 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
260 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
2413 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3578 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1422 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
1514 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
11589 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4