Core i7-4820K vs i5-2300
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2300 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-2300 gets 79.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.7 times faster than the i5-2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-2300 gets 79.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.7 times faster than the i5-2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2011
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
24.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
79.46k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
8.65k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
7.8k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
3.92k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.16k (x1.01)
TOTAL
32.49k
24.53k (x0.75)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
32.45k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
29.25k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
14.64k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
3.12k (x0.31)
TOTAL
134.08k
79.46k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
308 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
154 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
836 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
2791 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
2516 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
1343 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
7912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4