Core i7-4820K vs i3-7100
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i3-7100 gets 100.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.3 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i3-7100 gets 100.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.3 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906e9
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
130 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
126.47k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
14.41k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
22.38k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.45k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.96k (x1.21)
TOTAL
32.49k
47.21k (x1.45)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
30.48k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
52.08k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
12.97k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
4.56k (x0.45)
TOTAL
134.08k
100.1k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
598 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
1021 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
1963 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
1273 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
12105 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4