Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the 2700X gets 412.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the 2700X gets 412.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
800f82
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
130 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
431.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
14.44k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
24.92k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.8k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
19.07k (x4.63)
TOTAL
32.49k
64.24k (x1.98)
Multithread
i7-4820K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
122.01k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
220.34k (x4.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
59.89k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
9.9k (x0.99)
TOTAL
134.08k
412.13k (x3.07)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
1162 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
2099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
3925 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5796 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
4435 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
14939 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4