| | | | | | |

Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the 1800X gets 389.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.9 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
800f11
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
410.47k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
15.11k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
23.46k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.64k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
17.52k (x4.25)
TOTAL
32.49k
61.72k (x1.9)

Multithread

i7-4820K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
119.5k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
198.79k (x3.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
59.75k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
11.58k (x1.15)
TOTAL
134.08k
389.62k (x2.91)

Performance/W
i7-4820K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
2092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
4101 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5866 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1409 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
4379 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
15430 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4