| | | | | | |

Core i7-4820K vs i7-11700


Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i7-11700 gets 544.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 4.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0671
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
728.98k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
18.96k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
28.34k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
13.26k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
20.2k (x4.91)
TOTAL
32.49k
80.76k (x2.49)

Multithread

i7-4820K

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
164.31k (x3.45)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
253.96k (x4.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
115.28k (x5.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
10.65k (x1.06)
TOTAL
134.08k
544.2k (x4.06)

Performance/W
i7-4820K
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
2528 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
3907 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1773 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
8372 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3869 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
2707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
16482 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4