Core i7-4790K vs i5-11300H
Description
The i7-4790K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 215.5 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 215.5 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806c1
Core
Haswell
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
88 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2014
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.47k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
215.47k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790K
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.16k
25.83k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
14.78k
23.56k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
9.2k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
5.06k (x0.92)
TOTAL
52.47k
63.64k (x1.21)
Multithread
i7-4790K
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.76k
116.87k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
70.84k
121.08k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.99k
41.8k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
6k (x0.68)
TOTAL
215.47k
285.75k (x1.33)
Performance/W
i7-4790K
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1225 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
805 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
2448 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790K
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5946 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3359 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1254 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
11925 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4