Core i7-4790 vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i7-4790 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790 gets a score of 173.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.5 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790 gets a score of 173.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.5 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a50f00
Core
Haswell
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2014
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.73k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.89k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
22.19k
21.2k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.45k
25k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
11.44k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
24.22k (x4.87)
TOTAL
44.73k
81.87k (x1.83)
Multithread
i7-4790
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
87.14k
145.13k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
58k
198.36k (x3.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.75k
85.67k (x3.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
5.79k (x0.97)
TOTAL
173.89k
434.96k (x2.5)
Performance/W
i7-4790
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1037 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
691 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
2070 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5547 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4