| | | | | | |

Core i7-4790 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-4790 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790 gets a score of 173.9 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f82
Core
Haswell
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
44.73k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.89k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4790
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.51k
3.41k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
11.24k
15.96k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
4.69k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
17.42k (x3.47)
TOTAL
25.8k
41.47k (x1.61)

Multithread

i7-4790

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.72k
20.88k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
54.99k
110.37k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.87k
39.25k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.66k (x1.22)
TOTAL
100.06k
177.16k (x1.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.19k
13.83k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
12.45k
23.16k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.15k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
15.18k (x3.05)
TOTAL
44.73k
57.33k (x1.28)

Multithread

i7-4790

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
87.14k
83.44k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
58k
161.53k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.75k
40.62k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
6.72k (x1.12)
TOTAL
173.89k
292.31k (x1.68)

Performance/W
i7-4790
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1037 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
691 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2070 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4790
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5547 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4