| | | | | | |

Core i7-4770K vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i7-4770K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4770K gets a score of 173.9 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4770K is 1.8 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.21k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.93k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4770K
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.28k
13.02k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
20.56k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
4.81k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
5.43k (x1.11)
TOTAL
43.21k
43.82k (x1.01)

Multithread

i7-4770K

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.17k
27.29k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
56.81k
49.37k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
13.57k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.07k
5.61k (x0.62)
TOTAL
173.93k
95.84k (x0.55)

Performance/W
i7-4770K
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
1026 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
676 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
260 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
2071 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4770K
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
5456 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3141 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1226 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1257 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
11079 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4