Core i7-4770 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The i7-4770 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4770 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 3.7 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4770 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 3.7 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
306e4
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
10 /20
TDP
84 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
25600 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
45.19k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
184k points
551.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4770
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
10.55k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
12.55k
10.02k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
3.99k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.67k
3.66k (x0.78)
TOTAL
36k
28.23k (x0.78)
Multithread
i7-4770
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
56.17k
215.04k (x3.83)
Test#2 (FP)
59.54k
230.43k (x3.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.91k
96.87k (x4.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.76k (x1.07)
TOTAL
147.82k
551.1k (x3.73)
Performance/W
i7-4770
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
669 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
709 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
1760 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4770
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3491 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3217 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1198 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
9232 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4