Core i7-4770 vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The i7-4770 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4770 gets a score of 184 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4770 gets a score of 184 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f82
Core
Haswell
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.19k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
184k points
291.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4770
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.02k
13.76k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
11.89k
23.03k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.29k
5.12k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
15.23k (x3.06)
TOTAL
45.19k
57.13k (x1.26)
Multithread
i7-4770
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
94.23k
83.23k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
59.02k
161.06k (x2.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.06k
40.52k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.69k
6.73k (x1.18)
TOTAL
184k
291.53k (x1.58)
Performance/W
i7-4770
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1122 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
703 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
298 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2191 points/W
4485 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4770
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5902 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1278 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
11586 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4