| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs i7-9850H


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.2 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
906ed
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2013
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
289.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
19.83k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
16.52k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.87k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
9.02k (x2.71)
TOTAL
31.31k
49.24k (x1.57)

Multithread

i7-4765T

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
130.19k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
121.44k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
28.05k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
9.62k (x1.22)
TOTAL
134.53k
289.3k (x2.15)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4