| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs i5-8265U


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Haswell
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
143.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
19.19k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
17.47k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.04k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
5.97k (x1.79)
TOTAL
31.31k
46.67k (x1.49)

Multithread

i7-4765T

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
64.43k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
61.91k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
13.36k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
3.52k (x0.45)
TOTAL
134.53k
143.23k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
9548 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4