Core i7-4765T vs i5-10400F
Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
369.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
26.28k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
23.38k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.52k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
12.96k (x3.89)
TOTAL
31.31k
68.14k (x2.18)
Multithread
i7-4765T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
163.67k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
159.74k (x3.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
39k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
7.56k (x0.96)
TOTAL
134.53k
369.97k (x2.75)
Performance/W
i7-4765T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
5692 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4