Core i7-4765T vs i3-7100U
Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.7 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.7 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
79.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
13.46k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
13.45k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.08k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.4k (x1.02)
TOTAL
31.31k
33.38k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-4765T
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
34.95k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
33.53k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
7.74k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
3.38k (x0.43)
TOTAL
134.53k
79.6k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i7-4765T
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
2330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
2235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
5307 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
1415 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
13909 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4