| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs i3-6100T


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
506e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
105.21k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
19.58k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
16.97k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.91k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.47k (x1.04)
TOTAL
31.31k
43.92k (x1.4)

Multithread

i7-4765T

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
47.02k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
44.41k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
9.93k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
3.85k (x0.49)
TOTAL
134.53k
105.21k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
3006 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4