| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs Ryzen 7 4800HS


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 3.2 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
860f01
Core
Haswell
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
427.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
16.66k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
26.01k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
9.31k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
9.15k (x2.75)
TOTAL
31.31k
61.12k (x1.95)

Multithread

i7-4765T

4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
144.48k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
192.46k (x4.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
83.17k (x4.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
7.51k (x0.95)
TOTAL
134.53k
427.61k (x3.18)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
12218 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4