| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 3.1 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
410.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
15.02k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
24.26k (x2.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.53k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
16.26k (x4.88)
TOTAL
31.31k
61.07k (x1.95)

Multithread

i7-4765T

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
122.92k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
220.32k (x5.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
59.78k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
7.44k (x0.94)
TOTAL
134.53k
410.47k (x3.05)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4