Core i7-4765T vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
14.48k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
23.84k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.43k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
5.46k (x1.64)
TOTAL
31.31k
49.21k (x1.57)
Multithread
i7-4765T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
54.39k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
88.77k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
20.04k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
5.48k (x0.7)
TOTAL
134.53k
168.69k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i7-4765T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4