| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
13.75k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
22.58k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.99k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.55k (x1.07)
TOTAL
31.31k
44.87k (x1.43)

Multithread

i7-4765T

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
50.99k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
84.4k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
18.95k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
3.2k (x0.41)
TOTAL
134.53k
157.54k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4