| | | | | | |

Core i7-4720HQ vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 71.7 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 419.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 5.8 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
306e4
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
12 /24
TDP
47 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
3.44k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
9.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
4.21k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
3.94k (x1.05)
TOTAL
21.53k
21.13k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
73.17k (x6.28)
Test#2 (FP)
37.71k
230.83k (x6.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
107.14k (x6.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.94k
7.99k (x1.34)
TOTAL
71.69k
419.12k (x5.85)

Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
563 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
802 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
348 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
126 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
1525 points/W
3224 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1053 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2677 points/GHz
2726 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1044 points/GHz
1126 points/GHz
TOTAL
5980 points/GHz
6036 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4